Would your safety and security procedures stand up in court?

After an incident, investigators and insurers ask you to prove your security was reasonable. I audit the documents behind your controls, score them from 0 to 100 and give you a prioritised list of fixes, before anyone else looks.

Book a free 20-minute callScore a procedure free

No obligation. I reply within one business day.

Visitor access procedure
Version 3   Approved by: not recorded   Last review: not recorded
No threat named
No responsible role
Log review not evidenced
38 / 100
Prouse Forensic Index: fragile
Illustration of a scored procedure
Fixed fee from US$875Credited in full against a gap analysis
Results in 5 working daysFrom the day your documents arrive
Confidential by designNDA on request; files deleted after 90 days
Published methodSSRN working paper, aligned to ISO 31000 and ISO 19011

A control you cannot prove is a control you do not have

Most organisations have the gate, the guard and the alarm. Far fewer have the written procedure that shows who decided what, why, and when it was last checked.

After an incident, investigators and insurers do not ask whether you had security. They ask you to prove it was reasonable. If the paperwork is missing, out of date or generic, the control counts for little, and the people who signed it off are exposed.

I measure that gap before someone else does.

If it is not written down, it did not happen

Thirty seconds on why a control you cannot evidence counts for so little after an incident, and how to score one of yours for free.

Score a procedure free

Ten questions. Your answers stay in your browser.

Who this is for

Data centres and critical infrastructure

Test the procedures behind your physical security before commissioning, not after the incident, and give your board, investors and insurers a score they can rely on. How the data centre audit works

Directors and officers

In New Zealand and Australia, officers carry a personal duty of due diligence on health and safety. An independent score shows the board asked the question.

Venues and event operators

Martyn's Law is expected to apply in the UK from spring 2027. Venues for 200 or more people will need public protection procedures; those for 800 or more must document them for the regulator. Martyn's Law explained

Ports, vessels, airports and secure sites

Security plans are only as strong as the procedures behind them. Have yours tested independently, against the threats they are meant to stop.

Investors and fiduciaries

Show that the decision was documented before the money moved. Start with the five-question Documentation Test.

How it works

1

Send your documents

Share the procedures, policies or plans you want tested. Everything is handled in confidence, under a non-disclosure agreement if you want one.

2

I score them

Each document is assessed against the threats it is meant to address, using the Prouse Forensic Index: 0 to 39 fragile, 40 to 75 marginal, 76 to 100 robust.

3

You get a plan

A scorecard, a prioritised list of fixes and a briefing call. You know where you stand and what to do first.

The Prouse Forensic Index scaleBook a free 20-minute call

Fixed fees, in US dollars

No hourly billing. You know the cost before you send a single document.

Lowest-risk start

Single-procedure benchmark

US$875
Delivered in 5 working days

One critical procedure tested end to end, with an initial score and a gap summary. The fee is credited in full against a gap analysis booked within 30 days.

Start with one procedure
Full picture

Organisation gap analysis

US$6,450
Delivered in 15 working days

Up to ten core policies and procedures: a scorecard for each, a ten-page prioritised roadmap and a 30-minute briefing for you or your board.

Discuss a gap analysis
Ongoing assurance

Quarterly assurance retainer

US$2,150
A month, billed quarterly, after a gap analysis

Your documents re-tested every quarter, an updated scorecard each quarter, and a reply within one business day after an incident.

Ask about the retainer

Also available: associate work for consultancies at US$400 a day. All services and terms

Published work

Analysis

Anthropic Has Promised to Spend $142 Million a Day for Ten Years

An analysis of the documentation gaps facing investors in the most anticipated technology listing of 2026. Read the article

The Prouse Forensic Index scaleResearch

Bridging the Documentation Void

The working paper behind the method, published on SSRN in January 2026. Read the summary

Cover of the free handbook The 9.5% ProblemFree handbook

The 9.5% Problem

Score any procedure in ten minutes, with a procedure template, a document register and a 30-day plan. 23 pages, free. Get the handbook

Questions

Is this legal advice?

No. It is an independent risk assessment of your documentation, designed to sit alongside the advice of your lawyers and insurers.

How are my documents kept confidential?

Documents arrive by encrypted link or email, are stored in an encrypted folder, are used only for your engagement and are deleted 90 days after the final report unless you ask otherwise. An NDA is available before you send anything.

You are based in New Zealand. Can you work with us?

Yes. The audit is a document review, so it is done remotely for clients anywhere. Travel is possible when a site visit is needed.

What if our documents turn out to be fine?

Then you have an independent score that says so, which is worth having in front of a board, an insurer or a regulator.

How long does it take?

Five working days for a single procedure and fifteen for a full gap analysis, counted from the day your documents arrive.

Find out where you stand

Twenty minutes, no cost. Tell me what you are responsible for and I will tell you whether an audit would help, and what it would involve.

Book a free 20-minute call

Or email richard@confidentialriskconsulting.com

Book a free 20-minute call